ALBUQUERQUE -- When working at his Foundation for Sustainable Living in Costa Rica, Franklin Wilson directs a nonprofit organization that strives to develop “wise use” projects, like growing organic food locally and developing renewable resources.
So it simply makes sense that the Central American foundation’s Albuquerque office, which provides administrative support for the foundation and its programs and projects, should reflect those same principles.
The foundation office at 333 Lomas NE not only has cut its energy use, but produces power that can be sold back to PNM. Wilson wants to spread the word that anyone can pretty much do the same. In fact, he says, it’s “rather easy”:
The feeling of opening the mail and receiving a check from the utility company is hard to explain. It can be compared to receiving a dividend from your investment in a “green” company, except in this case we have eliminated the risk of investing with someone we may never see, or paying a commission to a broker. We are being paid directly to produce our own energy.
We were fortunate to find a reputable local dealer that was able to install a complete working system. We selected a grid-tied system whereby PNM purchases all of the excess power the system produces. In addition, PNM pays a conservation credit of $0.13 [2007 rate] per kilowatt hour [kWh] for all electricity generated.
To minimize overall cost we began by evaluating our present energy use, finding that the fluorescent ballast lighting installed in 1985 was consuming 2.5 times more energy than modern lighting systems. The old style produced more heat around the work spaces, which required greater work on the part of the cooling system.
A more efficient lighting system was installed, and now we work with better quality light, half the number of fluorescent tubes and 40 percent of the previous energy use.
The electric hot water heater was placed on a timer to produce hot water at lunchtime, and an on-demand hot water heater is proposed as a future energy saving replacement. We determined that the unvented attic space was a source of unwanted heat, and we installed two wind powered turbines to exhaust this heat. The cooler attic lowers cooling costs.
The building was designed and built in 1985 as a passive solar office.
The south-facing walls are all glass with a massive concrete Trombe wall located one foot inside the windows. A clerestory window also allows sunlight to strike the massive concrete north wall and store radiant solar energy. The design originally specified a passive system that relied on heat radiation and the convective loop to move the warm air through the building. Three small blowers controlled by a thermostat attached to ductwork were later added to move warm air to the cooler areas of the building. The heat produced is stored in the thick walls and concrete slab floor.
On those rare cloudy days, electric or gas heat warms the building. Springtime ventilation and summer cooling for most months is provided by evaporative coolers. These energy efficient units move fresh, humid air in through the ductwork and exhaust stale air to the outside through ceiling vents. Refrigerated air is used only in the hot humid months; this is done quite reluctantly because of the high energy consumption.
Wilson said that in order to determine the size of the system needed, the directors determined how much electricity they needed, which is measured in kilowatt hours.
The cost of a photovoltaic increases as the capacity of energy production increases. Our choices for sizing were dictated by roof area available to place panels, size of invertors and controllers readily available, peak energy demand, and initial capital the foundation was willing to invest.
We selected a system sized at 10 kilowatts (10kw), which means for each hour of optimum sunlight the panels can produce 10,000 watts. This is enough energy to illuminate 100 light bulbs of 100 watts each or, in the case of our office, provide all of our electric needs.
With an option of installing a smaller, less costly system, or purchasing a system that costs more but is capable of producing much more power, we chose abundance. The roof area was available, the funds were in the bank, and our commitment to make a statement of energy independence was strong, so a significant increase in system size resulted in a slight rise in cost.
When we built the original building we never asked, “When will this pay for itself?” We knew we would pay for the energy we consume and energy prices would always rise. The return on the money spent can be measured by the feeling that is present in the staff every day when we arrive at work to a comfortable work place that produces more electricity than it consumes.
For the price of a new economy car, a property owner can install a system that will create some energy independence, which for many will provide a strong sense that they can contribute to the overall well-being of the planet. Some will feel an urgency to act now and control a part of their energy consumption. To become an energy producer is rather easy and for the foundation it has been a rewarding experience.
Comments:
Posted 08/28/2008 13:27 with
Great story, Denise!
Thank you for showing readers how this can work. It is so important for increasing the comfort level of the general public on building or retrofitting in this manner. Time for renewable energy to move into the mainstream.