Do-little ideas no cure for oil addiction

By Heath Haussamen 05/14/2008 | 2 Comments

Ninety-seven U.S. senators voted on Tuesday to stop filling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve for six months, a move they say they hope will help ease the gas-price burden on motorists through the summer months. The vast majority of House members later followed suit in approving the proposal.

 

But the reality is that this was a do-nothing vote following weeks of partisan rhetoric designed to make it look, in this election year, like Congress is doing something to allay the concerns of angry Americans who are watching gas and food prices skyrocket. Meanwhile, substantive legislation that would actually help solve America’s energy and fuel crisis is nowhere to be found.

 

The rhetoric began on April 29 when President Bush publicly blamed Congress for doing nothing about rising oil prices. Two days later, Senate Republicans responded first, with U.S. Sen. Pete Domenici, backed by 19 Republican cosponsors, holding a news conference to announce legislation that would increase domestic oil production with more offshore drilling and by opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling.

 

Shortly after Domenici, R-N.M. and the ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, announced the introduction of that legislation, Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M. and chair of the committee, gave a speech on the Senate floor calling for a halt to the filling of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. He also made other proposals, including the suggestion that Americans drive slower.

 

Bingaman’s suggestions were soon followed by a bill from Senate Democrats that included some proposals he backed and others he did not. Democrats and Republicans then spent several days sending out news release after news release attacking the others’ proposals.

 

Domenici and Bingaman were no exception, engaging in the partisan rhetoric along with everyone else. A news release from Bingaman’s office “highlights flaws in Senate Republicans’ energy proposal,” while a release from Domenici says the Democrats’ plan is “running on empty.”

 

The Senate rejected Domenici’s proposal to increase production before voting overwhelmingly on Tuesday to stop filling the reserve, which would put another 70,000 barrels of oil per day on the market. That pales in comparison with daily consumption and would have little or no effect on gas prices. At best, prices would drop a few cents per gallon, only to start rising again from that point. That’s one reason the president has said he opposes the proposal.

 

A long-term solution is needed

 

All the talk is about short- and mid-term solutions – conserving oil, increasing production of oil, tightening oversight of oil companies and increasing taxes on oil companies. But focusing on oil won’t cure our addiction to it. Gas prices are going to continue to rise. We can increase domestic production and fuel efficiency as much as possible, but we’re not going to decrease our dependence on oil that way. We’ll just slow the rate at which it’s increasing.

 

The only way to decrease our dependence on oil is to replace it with other fuel sources.

 

We need leaders with the long-term vision to find ways to encourage or force development of alternative fuel and energy sources. America must break its addiction to oil, foreign and domestic. That’s going to take a long time. It will take leaders willing to set a goal that may not be accomplished until long after they leave office. In a political system that focuses on short-term thinking and the 24-hour news cycle, that’s going to be difficult.

 

But the only real solution is putting aside partisan rhetoric to work through substantive policy differences and find compromises that will increase America’s use of alternative fuel and energy sources. With gas and food prices shooting up as the economy and wages continue to stagnate, we can’t afford to waste our time with short-term political stunts that do little or nothing to solve the problem. It’s time we focus on the long-term solution we should have tackled years ago.

 

print print Share share

Comments:

joma
Posted 05/16/2008 12:18 with

To put gas prices in perspective, I Googled current prices in London to see what the Brits are up against. Currently, they are paying 112.9 pence per liter which works out to $8.33 per gallon, more than twice the rate we pay!

This is a global issue and the best scientific and political minds need to work on it. Screaming at each other won’t cut it.

If you construct a matrix of potential energy sources and the special interest groups who, for their own purposes, vehemently oppose development, it would be a dismal piece of paper. Everyone seems to be opposed to everything. Even if we could pave over Arizona and western New Mexico with enough solar farms to power the US and free up oil and gas for transportation, we’d have groups screaming about “no transmission lines through MY back yard”. Even wind turbines “kill birds, are unsightly, and made noise that upsets wildlife”.

The only way out will be when politicians stop listening (and taking money from) to the vocal special interests and do what is right for the country. Maybe that will start to happen when we start paying $8.00 a gallon for gas too.

geraldbyrnes
Posted 05/20/2008 18:22 with

I only hope it doesn’t take that long.

CATEGORIES IN THIS STORY:

About Heath Haussamen

Heath Haussamen

After seven years as a newspaper reporter and editor, Heath Haussamen left behind a stable paycheck in May 2006 to join the Internet revolution. He started Heath Haussamen on New Mexico Politics, a news Web site covering politics and government in New Mexico that was recently named by the Washing...

Most Popular